Types of Collaboration

Licensing, Outsourcing, Joint Ventures, Strategic Alliances, Collective Research Organizations, Mergers & Acquisitions. With a focus on partner evaluation metrics and international considerations, discover how companies can strategically navigate diverse collaborative models for breakthrough innovation and global success.

.credits: Mellisa A. Schilling

---

Collaborative business models play a pivotal role in today's dynamic and interconnected business environment. The actual execution of such models, however, can be intricate, making it crucial for engaged parties to carefully select and agree upon a suitable collaborative arrangement. This selection process is essential for establishing an efficient organizational structure, standardized processes, and a transparent governance model that outlines rules and responsibilities. (1)

Types of collaboration

Collaboration can take on various forms, ranging from informal arrangements to more structured and long term partnerships. Here, we delve into several types of collaborative business models, each with its unique characteristics and applications:

Licensing

• Is a legal arrangement where a party (the licensor) grants permission to another party (the licensee) to use its intellectual property, such as patents, trademarks, copyrights, or trade secrets

• Generates revenue without significant capital investment, expands market presence through licensees, allows access to established brands or technologies.

• Risk of unauthorized use, limited control over the licensee's actions, potential conflicts impacting the licensor's reputation.

Outsourcing

• Outsourcing is a business practice in which a company contracts out certain tasks, functions, or processes to external service providers instead of handling them in-house.

• Outsourcing aids in focusing on core competencies and accessing specialized skills.

• Developing clear communication channels and performance metrics is vital for effective outsourcing partnerships.

• Cost savings, increased efficiency, flexibility to scale operations based on business needs.

• Potential loss of control over quality and timing, communication challenges, concerns about data security.

Joint Ventures

• Joint ventures are collaborative partnerships where two or more entities pool resources and expertise to create a separate legal entity for a specific project or business objective.

• Shared risks and costs, access to complementary strengths, opportunities for market entry.

• Potential conflicts from differing objectives, slower decision-making, challenges in aligning partner interests.

• Consideration of cultural alignment and risk-sharing mechanisms is crucial for successful JV implementation.

Strategic Alliances

• Strategic alliances are formal agreements between independent entities to collaborate for mutual benefit, often without creating a new legal entity.

• Leverages strengths and capabilities, flexibility in partnership duration, faster market entry.

• Risk of information leakage, challenges in maintaining alignment, potential conflicts of interest.

• Temporary agreements in SA offer flexibility in resource utilization, serving as a strategic game-changer.

• Strategic partnerships under SA can range from cross-industry collaborations to innovation-focused alliances.

Collective Research Organizations

• Collective research organizations involve multiple entities collaborating on a common research initiatives, sharing resources and expertise.

• Pooling resources for research projects, access to diverse expertise, shared costs and risks.

• Coordination challenges, potential conflicts over intellectual property, need for effective management.

• Estrada et al. (2016) provide insights into inter partner dissimilarities and their impact on industry-university alliances.

• Establishing a collaborative culture and fostering open communication enhance the effectiveness of collective research organizations.

Mergers & Acquisitions

• Mergers involve the combination of two or more entities to form a new organization, while acquisitions involve one entity taking over another.

• Synergies for competitiveness, access to new markets and technologies, streamlined operations.

• Integration challenges, potential resistance and turnover, regulatory scrutiny.

• Performing thorough due diligence and post-merger integration planning are critical for M&A success.

---

Performance Evaluation & International Considerations

Analyzing collaborative performance is crucial, though a sheer survival / existence of a collaboration is not a sufficient determinant of success. Metrics such as goal achievement, financial indicators (ROA/ROI), and partner satisfaction (Sampson, 2005) contribute to a holistic assessment.

Navigating international collaborations requires additional considerations. References such as Kapoor and Lee (2013) and Rouyre and Fernandez (2019) provide insights into managing knowledge-sharing and protecting tensions in coupled innovation projects among competitors.

Conclusion

In the pursuit of international collaborations, businesses can leverage academic insights to strategically navigate diverse collaborative models. By understanding the nuances of each model and considering international dimensions, engaged partners can enhance their decision-making processes and foster successful collaborations on a global scale.

---

References

• Schilling M. A. (2020). Strategic management of technological innovation (Sixth). McGraw-Hill Education.

• Gassmann, O., Zeschky, M., Wolff, T., Stahl, M. (2010). Crossing the industry-line: Breakthrough innovation through cross-industry alliances with ‘non-suppliers’. Long Range Planning, 43(5-6), 639-654

• Kapoor, R., & Lee, J. M. (2013). Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organisational forms shape new technology investments. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 274-296.

• Sampson, R. C. (2005). Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 26(11), 1009-1031.

• Sampson, R. (2007) R&D alliances and firm performance: The impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2): 364-386

• Estrada, I., Faems, D., Cruz, N. M., & Santana, P. P. (2016). The role of inter partner dissimilarities in Industry-University alliances: Insights from a comparative case study. Research Policy, 45(10), 2008-2022.

• Estrada, I., Faems, D., & de Faria, P. (2016). Cooperation and product innovation performance: The role of internal knowledge sharing mechanisms and formal knowledge protection mechanisms. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 56-65.

• Du, J., Leten, B., Vanhaverbeke, W. (2014). Managing open innovation projects with science based and market-based partners. Research Policy, 43(5), 828-840.

• Kapoor, R., & Lee, J. M. (2013). Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organisational forms shape new technology investments. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 274-296.

• Li, D., Eden, L., Him, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Garrem, R. P. (2012). Governance in multilateral R&D alliances. Organization Science, 23(4), 1191-1210.

• Rouyre, A., & Fernandez, A. S. (2019). Managing knowledge sharing-protecting tensions in coupled innovation projects among several competitors. California Management Review, 62(1), 95-120.